Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42293933›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Can your eyes taste freshness? The role of visual realism, motion cues, and spatial imagery ability in juice packaging.

Yang Zhang, Zichen Lyu, Lin Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yang ZhangDepartment of Design, Graduate School, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Zichen LyuAcademy of Arts & Design, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Lin YangDepartment of Design, Graduate School, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines how visual realism and implied motion cues in juice packaging shape consumers' perceived food freshness and purchase intention in sensory-constrained evaluation contexts. It further investigates perceived image dynamism as a mediating mechanism and spatial imagery ability as an individual-difference boundary condition. Design/methodology/approach: Study 1 tested the effect of image realism (realistic vs. stylized) on perceived freshness, healthfulness, and purchase intention. Study 2 manipulated implied motion cues while holding style constant and examined mediation by perceived image dynamism. Study 3 tested the moderating effect of spatial imagery ability. Data were collected via online surveys and analyzed using ANOVA and PROCESS-based mediation and moderated-mediation models. Findings: Realistic imagery increased perceived food freshness, perceived healthfulness, and purchase intention. Implied motion cues enhanced perceived food freshness by increasing perceived image dynamism. Spatial imagery ability moderated this mechanism: the effect of perceived image dynamism on perceived food freshness was stronger among consumers with lower spatial imagery ability, suggesting that these consumers relied more heavily on externally presented motion cues when forming freshness judgments. Originality/value: This research advances the juice packaging and sensory marketing literature by integrating visual realism, implied motion cues, perceived image dynamism, and spatial imagery ability into a unified framework. The findings show that packaging imagery functions not merely as decoration but as an informational cue through which consumers infer product freshness. The study also highlights the role of consumer cognitive differences in shaping the effectiveness of visual packaging cues.

Indexed as

image realismimplied motion cuesjuice packagingperceived food freshnessperceived image dynamismspatial imagery ability

Identifiers

PMID42293933
PMCPMC13255026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.