Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42293925›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Threshold effects of interactional context on attentional control.

Min Li, Qinghong Xu, Xiangyu Shi, Shiwen Zhang, Jie Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Min LiSchool of Psychology, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, China.
Qinghong XuSchool of Foreign Languages, Yulin University, Yulin, China.
Xiangyu ShiStudent Affairs Department, Wuhai Vocational and Technical College, Wuhai, China.
Shiwen ZhangSchool of Management, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Jie LiSchool of Psychology, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The debate surrounding bilingual cognitive advantages has prompted researchers to focus on the dynamic regulatory mechanisms of bilingual experience. Methods: Using a cross-task priming paradigm, the present study investigated the threshold effects of bilingual interactional contexts on attentional control. In Experiment 1, 60 unbalanced Chinese-English bilinguals completed a single picture-naming task involving four interactional contexts (monolingual English, monolingual Chinese, bilingual, and voluntary naming). This was followed by an anti-saccade task. The results showed that a single exposure to dual-language contexts did not facilitate attentional control. Instead, it induced resource depletion, as evidenced by significantly prolonged reaction times. In Experiment 2, 40 bilinguals completed two consecutive blocks of the same picture naming task before performing the anti-saccade task. Results: The results showed that, compared with monolingual contexts, repeated exposure to dual-language contexts significantly enhanced attentional control, as indexed by faster reaction times and higher accuracy. Moreover, the facilitatory effect was stronger in the bilingual context than in the voluntary naming context. The contrast between the two experiments reveals a cumulative threshold of cognitive load: a single exposure falls below the threshold, resulting in resource depletion, whereas repeated exposure surpasses it, triggering adaptive reorganization of attentional control. Discussion: The present study provides preliminary evidence that the influence of bilingual contexts on attentional control may follow a threshold effect, offering a potential mechanistic account of bilingual cognitive plasticity.

Indexed as

adaptiveattentional controlcognitive controlinteractional contextlanguage switching

Identifiers

PMID42293925
PMCPMC13260011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.