ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Guided tours in historical and religious sites: emotional restoration and the role of individual differences.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study investigated how guided tours to historical and religious environments, specifically the archaeological site of Aquileia and the Benedictine Abbey of Praglia, both located in north-eastern Italy can influence perceived restorativeness and emotional responses (valence and arousal). Methods: A total of 149 participants completed questionnaires before and after a 45-min guided tour, assessing demographic variables, religiosity, connectedness to nature, emotional responses, perceived stress over the last month, and restorativeness. Results: Results revealed that emotional valence increased from pre- to post-visit at both sites, while arousal remained stable at Praglia, but increased at Aquileia. Restorativeness was positively predicted by the significance attributed to the visit, particularly regarding artistic, cultural, and historical values (Praglia and Aquileia), along with individual differences such as connectedness to nature (Aquileia) and perceived stress (Praglia). Discussion: Overall, visits to religious and historical sites in natural settings enhanced positive emotions, with site-specific differences in arousal. Perceived restorativeness was associated not only with the cultural and historical significance attributed to the visit but also with individual factors such as connectedness to nature and stress levels. These results highlight the role of both contextual meaning and personal characteristics in shaping restorative experiences, offering practical implications for designing guided tours that maximize psychological benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.