ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Factors influencing single young adults' intentions to accept AI virtual companion apps based on the theory of emotional design.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: AI virtual companion apps are increasingly used by single young adults as emotionally responsive media, yet acceptance studies often treat them as ordinary AI services or chatbots. This study examines how emotional design influences single young adults' intention to accept AI virtual companion apps. Methods: Drawing on emotional design theory, technology acceptance research, and human-AI companionship literature, a conceptual model was developed in which emotional design affects behavioral intention directly and indirectly through user experience. Emotional design was operationalized through four AI-companion-specific dimensions: interaction quality, visual appeal, perceived personalization, and intelligent adaptability. Measurement items were adapted from validated scales and refined through expert interviews. A survey was conducted with 635 Chinese single young adults who had used AI virtual companion apps for at least 1 month. Data were analyzed using reliability analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, correlation analysis, structural equation modeling, and bootstrap mediation testing. Results: The model showed adequate fit (CMIN/DF = 1.279; GFI = 0.980; AGFI = 0.971; IFI = 0.995; RMSEA = 0.021; CFI = 0.995; TLI = 0.994). Emotional design positively predicted user experience ( Conclusion: Intelligent adaptability and personalization appear especially important for the acceptance of AI virtual companion apps, while interaction quality and visual appeal support users' initial and ongoing experiences. These findings clarify how AI-specific emotional design features become behaviorally meaningful through user experience and contribute to media psychology and human-AI interaction research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.