ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The role of learning and training in supporting emotional resilience in security forces.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotional resilience is a key psychological competence enabling individuals to adapt positively to stress, overcome adversity, and maintain wellbeing in both personal and professional contexts. In dynamic, high-stakes environments such as security forces, it plays a critical role in professional performance, decision-making, and mental stability. This study analyses expert feedback from 224 personnel with operational experience to identify educational and training elements that enhance readiness, adaptability, and the capacity to cope with demanding situations. Rather than directly measuring emotional resilience, the research focuses on training-related factors perceived as contributing to its development. Using qualitative content analysis supported by statistical testing, several weaknesses within the current education and training system were identified. Based on the respondents' insights, the study proposes a revised training framework with a stronger emphasis on practical training, teamwork, international cooperation, and the involvement of external experts. The findings highlight the importance of structured educational interventions and continuous training programmes in fostering emotional resilience and strengthening professional competence within security forces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.