Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42293872›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

A qualitative study on incentive failure for college students in volunteer teaching programs.

Li Li Liu, Tian Tian Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Li Li LiuSchool of Foreign Languages, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China.
Tian Tian ShiSchool of Foreign Languages, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Volunteer teachers are an important supplementary force for the development of education in underdeveloped areas at present. Nevertheless, problems such as weak retention intention, low work enthusiasm and high turnover rate among volunteers cannot be ignored. It is important to examine how to effectively incentivize volunteers to participate in volunteer teaching. Methods: This study focuses on the issue of incentive failure among volunteer teachers. From the perspective of qualitative research and based on the grounded theory methodology, the research team conducted in-depth interviews with 36 volunteer teachers and carried out participatory observation of the daily work of 11 volunteer teachers. Through constant comparative analysis of the data and repeated review of analytic memos, categories and subcategories were clarified using the three-stage coding process of open coding, axial coding, and selective coding, and a model of the mechanism of incentive failure among volunteer teachers was constructed. Results: The findings indicate that the extrinsic motivating factors leading to incentive failure among volunteer teachers include insufficient organizational vitality, deficiencies in the institutional framework, and imbalance in societal attention, while the intrinsic motivating factor is difficulty in self-worth identity. This study constructs a mechanism model of incentive failure for volunteer teachers. Discussion: Based on the above research findings, this study discusses strategies to improve the volunteer incentive mechanism and puts forward suggestions from the perspectives of organizational vitality, institutional regulation, social public opinion and school education.

Indexed as

grounded theoryincentive failureorganizational vitalityself-worth identityvolunteer teachers

Identifiers

PMID42293872
PMCPMC13260595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.