ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Empathy and moral judgment as psychological mechanisms of socially oriented consumption: evidence from an emerging economy.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Understanding how individuals translate concern for others into ethically oriented behavior remains a central challenge in moral and social psychology. This study examines whether empathy is associated with socially oriented consumption decisions and whether this relationship is statistically indirect through moral judgment as a core evaluative process. Drawing on social cognition and moral psychology, empathy is conceptualized as a higher-order psychological construct comprising cognitive and affective dimensions, whereas moral judgment refers to individuals' evaluative assessments of fairness, responsibility, and harm in consumption contexts. Methods: The proposed model was tested using survey data from 1,000 adult urban consumers in Ecuador and analyzed through partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Results: The results show that empathy is positively associated with moral judgment, and that moral judgment is positively associated with socially oriented consumption decisions. Empathy is also positively associated with socially oriented consumption decisions. The mediation analysis indicates a pattern consistent with partial complementary mediation, suggesting that moral judgment constitutes an important evaluative pathway linking empathy and socially oriented consumption decisions. The model shows moderate-to-substantial explanatory power and robust measurement properties. Discussion: These findings contribute to moral and social psychology by clarifying how cognitive and affective empathy are jointly associated with moral judgment and socially oriented consumption decisions in everyday consumption contexts. By providing large-scale empirical evidence from Ecuador, the study broadens the contextual basis of existing psychological research beyond predominantly Western settings and highlights the relevance of integrating affective and evaluative processes in the study of socially embedded consumer behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.