ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026
Analysis of real-world re-induction outcomes with nadofaragene firadenovec in patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Re-induction with nadofaragene firadenovec: a fragile signal that should not influence clinical practice.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nadofaragene firadenovec is an intravesical gene therapy approved for use in patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer who have carcinoma in situ (CIS) with/without papillary disease (Ta or T1). It is administered every 3 months for as long as the patient maintains a complete response (CR). In the phase 2 and 3 clinical trial program, patients without CR at 3 months were not re-treated with nadofaragene firadenovec; however, many immune therapies do benefit from re-induction of this kind. We report findings from an observational cohort study of patients who underwent re-induction with nadofaragene firadenovec in a real-world setting. Electronic health records from US Specialty Networks private urology practices were used to identify patients with urothelial CIS with/without papillary disease (Ta or T1) who (I) underwent induction with intravesical nadofaragene firadenovec therapy; (II) failed to achieve a CR 3 months after the first dose but subsequently received ≥1 re-induction dose; and (III) had ≥1 follow-up cystoscopy examination. In total, 13 male patients [CIS alone (n=8), CIS + Ta (n=2), CIS + T1 (n=3)], aged (mean) 77.5 years, satisfied the study eligibility criteria. Patients had received a mean of 11 prior BCG doses; other prior therapy included gemcitabine (n=4) and pembrolizumab (n=5). Median follow-up was 379 (range, 135-519) days. After the first re-induction dose (Dose 2) of nadofaragene firadenovec, four patients (30.8%) achieved a CR, including two patients with CIS + T1. Of the patients with a CR, three received subsequent maintenance doses: one patient maintained a CR after Doses 3 and 4; one patient showed disease persistence/recurrence after Dose 4, and one patient progressed to T2a disease 15 months after re-induction. Nine patients experienced treatment failure after first re-induction with nadofaragene firadenovec; two received a second re-induction dose without response. In this real-world cohort, approximately 30% of patients achieved a CR after re-induction with nadofaragene firadenovec, supporting the proof of concept of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.