Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42293816›Full record

ReviewCurrent addiction reports2026

Progressing from Simple to Multidimensional Models Towards a Biopsychosocial Framework of Addiction.

Paul S Regier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current addiction reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Paul S RegierDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Neuroscientific models of addiction have evolved over the past four decades from single-circuit dopamine frameworks to dual-process, tripartite, and multidimensional accounts. Despite these advances, existing models incompletely account for the lived experience of addiction and for developmental, social, and mental-health factors that contribute to heterogeneity in risk and outcome. This review synthesizes this progression and evaluates the need for more integrative frameworks. Recent Findings: Recent work highlights addiction-related alterations in large-scale brain networks and demonstrates that psychosocial and contextual factors play a more central mechanistic role than previously acknowledged. Emerging interventions, including psychedelic-assisted therapies, further underscore the relevance of multilevel change across neurobiological, cognitive, and affective domains. Summary: Framing addiction as a multilevel, interactive process within a biopsychosocial framework provides a unifying perspective that accommodates heterogeneity in pathways and outcomes. Integrative models may better inform mechanistic research and guide the development of more precise, clinically meaningful interventions.

Indexed as

AllostasisBiopsychosocialDopamineIncentive SalienceInhibitionPsychedelics

Identifiers

PMID42293816
PMCPMC13260147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.