ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Machine Learning Methods to Predict the Academic Performance of Pre-Clinical Dental Students Based on Pre-University Information.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Methods to Predict the Academic Performance of Pre-Clinical Dental Students Based on Pre-University Information.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Information regarding the prediction of dentistry students' academic performances using machine learning (ML) techniques is lacking. The objective of this study was to predict the academic performance of pre-clinical dentistry students using ML techniques based on their pre-university information. Methods: A total of 96 data points, including graduation years, genders, high school grade point average (GPA), step 1 university exam score (Step 1 UES), Step 2 UES, total UES, university exam ratings (UER), high school types (HSTypes), hometowns, parent educations (PEs), and parent incomes (PIs) from dentistry grads, were collected. Various ML regression techniques were validated to predict the academic performance of dentistry students in this cross-sectional study. Results: Preliminary findings from the dataset indicated that UESs or rankings were more predictive than other demographic features, such as HSType, gender, graduation year, and hometown. The selection of target variables has resulted in two major studies. The initial study employed overall preclinical scores as the target variable, whereas the subsequent study utilized letter grades from specific preclinical courses, including dental morphology manipulation, dental materials I, prosthodontics I, and prosthodontics II, for ML models. The performance measures of these models demonstrated the capability of ML models to evaluate student performance in relation to demographics, high school performance, and admission scores. Regression models exhibiting an Conclusion: The present study revealed the utilization of ML techniques to predict the academic performance of dentistry students successfully.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.