ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Carbon Nanodot-enabled Fluorescent Nerve Conduits for Peripheral Nerve Repair: A Systematic Review of Translational Readiness.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review evaluates the translational readiness of carbon nanodot (CD)-enabled nerve conduits within the broader context of peripheral nerve repair. Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology, major databases were searched through January 2025 for clinical, preclinical, biomaterial, imaging, degradation, and economic studies related to autograft, allograft, conduit repair, CDs, and fluorescence-guided nerve visualization. Sixty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. CD-containing conduits, including fruit-peel-derived systems, have demonstrated tunable fluorescence, neural-range conductivity, and favorable Schwann cell and axonal responses but remain limited to small-animal proof-of-concept models, without good laboratory practice toxicology, large-animal studies, investigational device exemption-enabling data, or human trials. In contrast, fluorescence-guided nerve imaging with near-infrared agents and nerve autofluorescence is already clinically validated under standard operating room lighting, defining target emission windows and signal-to-background thresholds for future CD-based scaffolds. CDs undergo enzyme-mediated biodegradation and can be immobilized within hydrogels for controlled, degradation-linked release; however, their long-term in vivo fate and mass balance remain incompletely characterized. Across studies, CD synthesis is hindered by major reproducibility and quality-control gaps in quantum yield, particle size, and surface chemistry. Economic analyses highlight substantial donor-site morbidity and operative time costs for autografts, a lack of transparent device-level pricing for allografts and conduits, and preliminary evidence of cost-effectiveness advantages for allografts over nonoperative management. Overall, CDs are scientifically promising but translationally immature compared with established passive conduits, and targeted advances in manufacturing, safety, imaging performance, and economic evaluation will be required for clinical adoption.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.