ArticleTobacco induced diseases2026
Textual analysis of 38 Chinese subnational tobacco control regulations against FCTC Article 8.
Article in Tobacco induced diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChina ratified the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in 2005; it entered into force domestically on 9 January 2006. Absent of comprehensive national smoke-free legislation, subnational jurisdictions have enacted dedicated tobacco control regulations heterogeneously. The textual architecture distinguishing FCTC Article 8-compliant from non-compliant drafting has not been systematically characterized at corpus scale.
methodsThis study compiled 38 Chinese subnational dedicated tobacco control regulations enacted or materially amended after FCTC entry into force (9 January 2006 through 31 December 2024) (100635 substantive Chinese characters). Each was independently evaluated against the four core requirements of the FCTC Article 8 Implementation Guidelines [FCTC/COP2(7), 2007] and triangulated against an authoritative expert database. A five-layer framework examined corpus scale, compliance, e-cigarette prohibitions, enforcement features, and other FCTC complementary measures. Mann-Whitney U tests with Cliff's delta and Fisher's exact tests were used (two-sided, α = 0.05).
resultsOf 38 regulations, 10 (26.3%) met FCTC Article 8 compliance criteria; 28 (73.7%) did not. Compliant regulations had higher median character counts (3249 vs 2572; δ=0.40, p=0.066) and clause counts (28.0 vs 23.0; δ=0.46, p=0.034). E-cigarette prohibitions (60.0% vs 25.0%, p=0.062) and cessation service requirements (90.0% vs 50.0%, p=0.056) were more frequent in compliant regulations. The 10 compliant jurisdictions cover an estimated 121.6 million residents (8.6% of mainland China's 2020 population).
conclusionsGreater corpus elaboration, more complete enforcement specification, and inclusion of FCTC-aligned complementary measures are textual features systematically associated with - though not shown to cause - FCTC Article 8 compliance in Chinese subnational law. These findings characterize legal text rather than implementation outcomes and inform drafting guidance for Chinese cities and other jurisdictions pursuing Article 8 implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.