ArticleGastro hep advances2026
Beyond Awareness: A Qualitative Assessment of Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Care Pathways in Primary Care.
Article in Gastro hep advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Health-care systems must adapt to a rising burden of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), yet implementation in primary care remains challenging. While existing strategies often target knowledge deficits, our study uniquely examines how cognitive, contextual, and experiential factors shape general practitioners' (GPs) decision-making. This qualitative study explores GPs' experiences with MASLD care and previous care innovations to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing MASLD care pathways in primary care. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with 15 Dutch GPs from diverse backgrounds, enhancing data richness through cointerviewing. Guided by an interpretivist approach, we applied inductive thematic analysis per Braun and Clarke. Maximum variation sampling was applied, and interviewing continued until sufficient information power was achieved for analytic sufficiency. Results: Findings were organized using a sliding scale framework: 1 consistent theme promoting innovation and 3 dynamic themes that can facilitate or impair innovation. GPs expressed strong intrinsic motivation for innovations, rooted in patient-centeredness and lifelong learning, yet continuously weighed this against identity-related, relational, and practical considerations. GPs stressed that primary care is not merely hospital care at a different place. They evaluate innovations pragmatically through a Bayesian lens, considering prior disease probability, test performance, and feasibility, combined with assessment of individual patient benefit. Key barriers included low perceived urgency for MASLD, driven by limited experiential knowledge and skepticism toward specialist-derived evidence. GPs perceived trust-based partnerships, organizational continuity, and contextual fit as critical. Conclusion: Implementing hepatology-derived innovations in primary care is complex and extends beyond financial incentives or educational interventions. Effective strategies require codesigned, context-sensitive, and practice-integrated approaches that align with GPs' distinct logic and perspectives, including of those less engaged with MASLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.