Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42293709›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026

Negotiating gender and creative work in Shanghai's music industry: female creative workers' career choices and development.

Yixuan Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yixuan YangShanghai Conservatory of Music, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article examines the career choices and professional development of female creative workers in Shanghai's music industry and addresses the underexplored gendered dynamics of creative labour in China. Material realities of cultural production have received significant attention concerning artists' insufficient remuneration and atypical employment; however, how women cope with the complexities of precarious creative work, the pressures of urban life, and gender inequality in China has not been fully documented. This study adopts a qualitative research approach, drawing on 30 in-depth semi-structured interviews and applying thematic analysis. The research findings reveal that career choices are primarily driven by intrinsic motivation, particularly passion for music, while educational background, social networks, economic considerations, and industry prestige also influence decisions. Regarding professional experiences, the urban environment of Shanghai, the creative industry ecosystem, personal experiences, and support resources collectively shape job satisfaction and career development potential. Gender effects are observed through implicit workplace discrimination and conflicts between professional identity and family responsibilities. Career planning is influenced by factors such as marriage and childbearing, salary, growth potential, job stability, working hours, and stress, with family, social networks. These findings suggest that the precariousness of female creative labour in China cannot be understood solely through universal accounts of creative work insecurity. Rather, it is shaped by the interaction between global creative labour inequalities and China's specific gender norms, labour structures, and policy environment. The study therefore contributes to broader debates on gendered precarity by highlighting how local institutional contexts reshape the experience of creative labour across the life course.

Indexed as

careercreative labourcultural and creative industriesgender equalitymusic industry

Identifiers

PMID42293709
PMCPMC13253485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.