Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42293702›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2026

Decision-to-delivery interval and associated factors among women undergoing emergency caesarean section in public hospitals of West and North Gojjam Zones, Northwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study, 2024.

Nurlign Zelalem, Mulunesh Alemayehu, Mulatu Kassahun, Bekalu Endalew, Daniel Mulat Eshetu, Alehegn Chalie, Andinet Bewketu, Gedefaw Diress

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nurlign ZelalemFinote Selam General Hospital, Finote Selam, Ethiopia.
Mulunesh AlemayehuDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Mulatu KassahunDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Injibara University, Injibara, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2973-8142
Bekalu EndalewDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Daniel Mulat EshetuDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Injibara University, Injibara, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1201-904X
Alehegn ChalieFinote Selam General Hospital, Finote Selam, Ethiopia.
Andinet BewketuFinote Selam General Hospital, Finote Selam, Ethiopia.
Gedefaw DiressDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The decision-to-delivery interval is the time between the decision to perform an emergency cesarean section and the delivery of the newborn. Prolonged decision-to-delivery interval increase the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including fetal hypoxia, neonatal morbidity, and maternal complications. World Health Organization recommend that delivery should occur within 30 minutes when there is an immediate threat to the life of the mother or fetus. According to the World Health Organization classification, emergency cesarean sections are categorized based on urgency, with Category 1 indicating an immediate threat to maternal or fetal life requiring rapid intervention. However, achieving the recommended decision-to-delivery interval remains challenging in low-resource settings. Therefore, this study aimed to assess delayed decision-to-delivery interval and identify factors among women undergoing emergency cesarean section in public hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia. Methods: Institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from January to March 2024 among 523 women who underwent emergency cesarean section in public hospitals. Participants were selected using systematic random sampling. Data were collected using a pretested interviewer-administered questionnaire, medical record review, and an observational checklist assessing operating room readiness and availability of surgical materials. Data were entered into Epi-Data and analyzed using SPSS. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors. Result: The proportion of delayed decision-to-delivery interval (>30 minutes) was 79.9% (95% confidence interval: 76.2-83.3). Non-availability of operating room materials (adjusted odds ratio= 12.0; 95% confidence interval: 1.6-89.7), lack of a free operating room (adjusted odds ratio = 4.9; 95% confidence interval: 2.27-10.47), and cesarean section performed by integrated emergency obstetric surgeons (adjusted odds ratio = 2.98; 95% confidence interval: 1.03-8.62) were significantly associated with delayed. Conclusion: Only one-fifth of emergency caesarean sections met the recommended 30-minute standard. Delays were mainly related to operating room availability, shortages of surgical materials, and surgery performed by integrated emergency obstetric surgeons rather than gynaecologists. Addressing these system-level and human resource constraints, and conducting further qualitative or quality improvement studies, is recommended.

Indexed as

decision to delivery intervalemergency cesarean sectionWest and North Gojjam zones

Identifiers

PMID42293702
PMCPMC13263494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.