SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Understanding pathways from primary health care to universal health coverage outcomes: a realist review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Primary Health Care (PHC) rooted in community empowerment, integrated service delivery, and multisectoral action is central to efforts toward Universal Health Coverage (UHC), yet little is known about how PHC reforms influence UHC outcomes across contexts. This review examines how PHC approaches affect population coverage, service coverage, and financial protection by identifying what works, for whom, under what circumstances, and why. Methods: A realist review was conducted using studies from countries with the greatest gains in the UHC Service Coverage Index between 2000 and 2021. Forty-two studies met quality criteria following blinded screening, appraisal, and data extraction. Data were synthesized through iterative development of explanatory configurations linking PHC mechanisms, contexts, and UHC outcomes. The evidence base was limited, concentrated mainly in India and China, and largely published after 2020. Results: Two key configurations emerged: one on reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health and nutrition, and another on overall PHC design and delivery. The predominance of RMNCH-focused reforms reflects long-standing reform sequencing in many health systems and highlights how RMNCH platforms often function as foundational entry points for PHC strengthening. Across both configurations, reforms frequently emphasized service expansion, benefit package design, and insurance or financing initiatives, with greater attention to contact than effective coverage. Frontline workers, community organizations, and multisectoral actors played critical roles, while persistent geographic, transport, and equity barriers hindered progress. PHC reforms contributed to improvements in coverage and financial protection but fell short in reaching marginalized groups, reducing financial barriers, and enhancing service quality. Discussion: Strengthening community engagement, regulating private sector roles, and advancing multisectoral collaboration remain essential, and further research is needed to understand how PHC strategies function across diverse contexts to better support UHC. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024523631.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.