ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
A review of pretreatment methods and detection techniques for nonylphenol.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nonylphenol (NP) is a ubiquitous endocrine-disrupting chemical with confirmed adverse effects on multiple human physiological systems, posing urgent demands for its accurate detection in environmental and biological matrices. This review aims to systematically summarize the pretreatment methods and mainstream detection techniques for NP, with a critical synthesis of their analytical performance, applicable scenarios, advantages, and limitations. Core comparative findings are clarified: chromatography-mass spectrometry technologies (LC-MS/MS, GC-MS) are the gold standard for trace NP detection in complex matrices, with differentiated pretreatment requirements; HPLC has wide applicability but limited sensitivity for ultra-trace analysis; immunological assays are suitable for rapid on-site screening but with high detection limits. This work provides standardized guidance for NP detection method selection, directly supporting environmental monitoring and health risk assessment of NP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.