ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
A compliance assessment tool for household pit latrines and cesspits against RS ISO 24521: evidence from Kigali City.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: On-site sanitation systems (OSS) are the primary sanitation technology used to manage household fecal sludge in the Global South, including Kigali City. Poor quality OSS can lead to the spread of fecal-oral diseases and water resource pollution. Previous studies have demonstrated that OSS in Kigali are ineffective. In 2018, the Rwanda Standards Board adopted ISO 24521 to guide the design, construction, and management of domestic OSS. However, limited evidence exists on the compliance of OSS with the established guidelines, and no established tools are currently available to assess such compliance. This study developed and tested an assessment tool to evaluate the compliance of households' pit latrines and cesspits against RS ISO 24521 and identify factors associated with compliance. The study further proposes recommendations for enhanced compliance coverage and safe sanitation services in Kigali. Methods: The tool was tested through a survey of 903 households in five sectors of Gasabo District in Kigali, through facility inspection, questions, and observations. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Generalized Linear Mixed Model, and Rao-Scott chi-squares. Within RS ISO 24521, four standard objectives were covered: (i) Protection of Public Health, (ii) Meeting Needs and Expectations of Users, (iii) Sustainability, and (iv) Protection of Environment. Results: The results show that full compliance with the four standard objectives was 0.5, 4.8, 0.4 and 3.4% for pit latrines, and 79.2, 11, 0.4 and 2% for cesspits. Technical awareness and hygiene behavioral factors were found to be associated with low compliance. Both pit latrines and cesspits showed very low full compliance with the Sustainability objective, which in turn precluded examination of any associations to full compliance for this objective. For characteristics included in Protection of Public Health, factors such as wealth, house tenure, and residence type showed significant associations. Discussion and conclusion: To address the low compliance with selected objectives of RS ISO24521, recommendations emphasize increased enforcement of regulations, sanitary inspections, promotion of hygiene behavior change, and sustainable water supply. By evaluating the assessment tool, an improved version is proposed to support the management of OSS in Kigali, as well as in other cities with rapid urban growth and high reliance on OSS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.