Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42293651›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Gender and age disparities in attitude and preferences of probiotic and prebiotic-rich foods and supplements among adults in Saudi Arabia.

Rouba Khalil Naaman, Wejdan Talal Alghafari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rouba Khalil NaamanDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Wejdan Talal AlghafariDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In recent decades, probiotic and prebiotic-rich foods and supplements have gained considerable attention for their health benefits, particularly the promotion of gut health. Despite the widespread publicity around these benefits, there is a lack of recognition of the effects of gender and age on attitudes and preferences regarding the intake of these foods and supplements. Therefore, this study aimed to assess gender and age differences in attitudes and preferences concerning probiotic and prebiotic-rich foods and supplements among adults in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between May and July 2023 among adults aged ≥18 years recruited from different regions of Saudi Arabia. An online valid questionnaire was used to assess attitudes and preferences regarding probiotic and prebiotic-rich foods and supplements. Results: A total of 915 participants completed the survey. Probiotics and prebiotics ever users, and never users accounted for 62, and 38% of the participants, respectively. Among the ever users, the main reason for using probiotics and prebiotics was gastrointestinal problems (57%). Females were more likely than males to prefer online or international pharmacies as sources of probiotics and prebiotics (24% vs. 12%, Discussion/conclusion: Gender and age play a role in adults' attitudes and preferences concerning probiotic and prebiotic-rich foods and supplements, particularly in terms of preferred sources as well as the forms and duration of consumption. Further studies are required to examine more determinants of probiotic and prebiotic intake.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsPrebioticsProbioticsAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSaudi ArabiaSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultPrebioticsageattitudesgenderprebioticspreferencesprobioticsSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID42293651
PMCPMC13260273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.