ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Deployment, dispatch, and delivery: a scoping review of drone-delivered AED for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) constitutes a significant global public health burden, and early defibrillation is essential for patient survival. However, traditional emergency medical services frequently struggle to achieve the requisite response times. Drone-delivered automated external defibrillators (AEDs) have emerged as an innovative intervention strategy to address this challenge. This scoping review aimed to systematically map the current evidence on drone-delivered AED systems for OHCA and identify knowledge gaps for future research. Methods: Systematic searches were conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINAHL, and IEEE Xplore databases. Eligible studies were analyzed using an inductive coding approach, and findings were synthesized into a conceptual framework. Results: Eighteen studies were included. Evidence was organized into a "3D Framework" comprising three operational dimensions: Deployment (where), Dispatch (when), and Delivery (how). Multi-rotor drone systems demonstrated preliminary operational readiness with high delivery success rates (81-100%) with no reported injuries or serious adverse safety events. Time advantages over conventional emergency medical services were context-dependent, with drones arriving first in 67-93% of rural cases versus 32% in urban settings. One successful case of drone-delivered AED defibrillation with patient survival has been documented. Conclusions: Current evidence, predominantly from simulation studies, suggests that drone-delivered AED systems demonstrate preliminary technical feasibility and potential time advantages, particularly in rural and underserved areas. However, real-world clinical evidence remains limited, and findings should be interpreted with caution given language restrictions, study heterogeneity, and limited geographic and socioeconomic diversity of included studies. Further research is needed to validate these preliminary findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.