SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Addressing non-communicable diseases risk factors through innovative and context-sensitive approaches in the eastern Mediterranean region: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of mortality in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR), driven largely by modifiable behavioral and metabolic risk factors such as unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, tobacco use, and obesity. Innovative and context-sensitive interventions are increasingly recognized as essential to address these challenges, particularly in settings characterized by sociocultural constraints, fragile health systems, and humanitarian crises. This systematic review aimed to examine evidence on innovative approaches for addressing NCD risk factors in the EMR. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase) were searched for studies published between January 2000 and December 2025. Eligible studies evaluated innovative or context-sensitive interventions targeting modifiable NCD risk factors in EMR populations and included randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, natural experiments, and field trials. Data were extracted using a standardized form, and methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Due to heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively. Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, with most conducted in Tunisia and additional evidence from Jordan, Palestine, Iran, and Saudi Arabia. Interventions included integrated mental health and NCD programs, community-based initiatives, workplace interventions, culturally adapted health promotion programs, and system-level incentive models. These interventions demonstrated improvements in cardiometabolic outcomes, dietary behaviors, and physical activity, although effects varied across settings. Tobacco-related outcomes were inconsistent, and composite cardiovascular risk scores showed limited improvement. No studies implemented interactive digital health platforms; one study used pedometers as passive monitoring tools. Conclusions: Innovative, community-based, culturally responsive, and multisectoral interventions show promise in addressing NCD risk factors in the EMR. However, evidence remains limited, geographically concentrated, and methodologically heterogeneous. The absence of evaluated digital health interventions highlights a gap in the current evidence base. Future research should prioritize rigorous designs, scalable models, and evaluation of digital health strategies to strengthen NCD prevention across the region. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251064273.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.