Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42293640›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Combinatorial (bio-geo-temporal) and non-combinatorial analysis of the COVID-19 dissemination that affected Georgia (the country) in 2021.

S D Smith, E M Geraghty, T Goldstein, A L Rivas, F O Fasina, M Kosoy, P Imnadze, L Malania, L Kandelaki, I Burjanadze and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

S D SmithGeospatial Research Services, Ithaca, NY, United States.
E M GeraghtyEsri, Redlands, CA, United States.
T GoldsteinOne Health Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
A L RivasSchool of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
F O FasinaDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Nairobi, Kenya.
M KosoyKB One Health LLC, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
P ImnadzeNational Center for Disease Control & Public Health, Tbilisi, Georgia.
L MalaniaNational Center for Disease Control & Public Health, Tbilisi, Georgia.
L KandelakiNational Center for Disease Control & Public Health, Tbilisi, Georgia.
I BurjanadzeNational Center for Disease Control & Public Health, Tbilisi, Georgia.
A L HoogesteijnDepartment of Human Ecology, CINVESTAV, Merida, Yucatan, Mexico.
T C CollinsCollege of Population Health, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
R K PillaUniversity of Milan, Milan, Italy.
J M FairBiosecurity, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: To extract more information from the same data and support decision-making, we explored whether bio-geo-temporal (BGT) variables could distinguish municipalities where BGT variables differed and (if prioritized in subsequent interventions) could lead to cost-effective decision-making. This study was conducted investigating COVID-19 outbreaks reported in Georgia in 2021. Methods: Using both commercial and non-commercial proprietary software packages, we explored the test positivity rate or TP % (percentage of test-positive results among tested individuals), the date and the georeferenced location of municipalities where tests were conducted, as well as the associated population and road density (municipal road length / municipal area). Analyses included spatial (Getis-Ord and Moran's I) and non-spatial statistical tests. Results: While the TP% was not linearly related with any one variable, combinations of BGT variables displayed distinct data patterns that separated two groups of municipalities (one composed of just two municipalities). The two-municipality group showed a statistically significantly greater median road density than the remaining municipalities. The same two municipalities also possessed a greater ability to detect asymptomatic cases: they expressed 20.3 times larger TP%/km Discussion: Findings supported the view that methods exploring dynamic combinations of BGT relationships may identify highly connected municipalities (those likely to behave as network nodes during disease dissemination processes) when tested as TP%/km

Indexed as

COVID-19Disease OutbreaksGeorgia (Republic)HumansSARS-CoV-2cost-effectivenessCOVID-19epidemiologyGeographical Information SystemsGeorgia (country)

Identifiers

PMID42293640
PMCPMC13260472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.