ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
A wearable IMU-based framework for daily physical activity recognition and energy expenditure level classification in university students.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Insufficient physical activity and prolonged sedentary behavior remain common among university students, yet conventional self-reports suffer from recall bias. The key idea of this research is to establish a unified, single-sensor framework that bridges engineering-based activity recognition with public health-oriented energy assessment by mapping raw inertial signals directly to metabolic intensity levels. Methods: This study developed and evaluated a waist-worn IMU-based framework for daily physical activity recognition and energy expenditure level classification. A purpose-built dataset was collected from 96 healthy university students (mean age 20.4 ± 1.7 years), yielding 106,376 valid signal windows across six representative activities: sitting, standing, level walking, stair ascent, stair descent, and jogging. Triaxial acceleration and angular velocity signals were processed through filtering, normalization, and sliding-window segmentation. Results: Under leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) validation, the best-performing CNN-LSTM model achieved an accuracy of 93.8% (macro-F1: 0.932) for activity recognition and 89.6% (macro-F1: 0.883) for three-level energy expenditure classification. Discussion: The primary contribution lies in validating single-sensor feasibility within a specific campus movement ecology, demonstrating that the system can simultaneously deliver behavioral and metabolic insights without
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.