ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Stakeholders' perspectives on HIV prevention in the Czech Republic: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The present study explores stakeholder perspectives on HIV prevention in the Czech Republic, with a focus on perceived gaps and priorities in current strategies. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 institutional stakeholders, including representatives of governmental institutions, non-governmental organizations, healthcare providers, insurers, and the pharmaceutical sector. The present study combined qualitative content analysis with quantitative analysis of coded data. Results: It was determined by stakeholders that men who have sex with men (MSM) represent the primary focus of current HIV prevention efforts. Concurrently, certain stakeholders emphasized the necessity to reinforce preventive measures for additional demographic groups, most notably migrants and heterosexual populations. Transgender individuals and prisoners were mentioned less frequently, indicating their limited visibility in stakeholder discussions. The primary challenges identified included funding constraints, a lack of reimbursement for PrEP, stigma, and inadequate coordination of prevention strategies. These findings are indicative of stakeholder perspectives and should be interpreted as exploratory. Discussion: The report identifies areas for further research and potential discussion, particularly regarding the balance of prevention efforts across different population groups and the need for improved coordination and access to prevention tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.