ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026
Decoding the seminal microbial fingerprint and semen quality: insights from the first Greek pilot study.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recent evidence suggests that human semen harbors a complex microbiome that may influence semen quality and male fertility. However, comprehensive characterization of bacterial and fungal communities in semen remains limited, particularly using long-read sequencing technologies. Methods: In this pilot study, 80 semen samples from 80 men were analyzed and classified based on conventional semen-analysis findings into normozoospermic ( Results: Phylum-level analysis revealed distinct microbial profiles between groups. Normozoospermic samples were dominated by Bacillota (64.13%), followed by Actinomycetota (14.61%) and Pseudomonadota (12.95%). In contrast, abnormal samples showed reduced Bacillota abundance (2.32%) and enrichment of Campylobacteriota (10.82%). At the genus level, normozoospermic samples were characterized by predominance of Enterococcus, Cutibacterium, Streptococcus, Finegoldia, and Staphylococcus, whereas abnormal samples showed increased abundance of Campylobacter, Stenotrophomonas, and Agrobacterium. Species-level profiling identified Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate significant differences in seminal microbiome composition between normozoospermic and abnormal semen samples parameters. Alterations at the phylum, genus, and species levels were associated with impaired semen parameters, suggesting a potential link between microbial dysbiosis and male reproductive health. Furthermore, the absence of detectable fungal communities indicates that fungi may be rare or absent in human semen under physiological conditions. This study provides novel insights into the bacterial and fungal landscape of the seminal microbiome using long-read sequencing technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.