ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Calcific tendinitis with intraosseous migration mimicking malignancy.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calcific tendinitis with intraosseous migration represents a diagnostic pitfall that frequently simulates aggressive bone neoplasms on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), potentially triggering unnecessary oncologic workup. The authors report the case of a 26-year-old woman on immunosuppressive therapy presenting with acute, debilitating left shoulder pain. Initial MRI demonstrated a permeative-appearing process of the proximal humeral metaphysis with extensive bone marrow edema and cortical erosion, prompting a referral to orthopedic oncology. Subsequent multimodality correlation and computed tomography (CT)-guided fine-needle aspiration confirmed focal hydroxyapatite deposition without evidence of malignancy or infection. This case highlights the "edema-dominant" presentation of the resorptive phase and underscores the necessity of radiographic or CT correlation to identify MRI-occult mineralization. Recognizing enthesis-centered distribution and smooth cortical remodeling allows for confident conservative management of this self-limiting condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.