ArticleData in brief2026
Multi-session, multi-device acoustic dataset for progressive tool degradation monitoring.
Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Audio sensing provides a low-cost, non-contact modality for monitoring mechanical equipment health. Many degradations and faults manifest as gradual changes in spectral and temporal structure (e.g., increased broadband friction noise, harmonic shifts, airflow turbulence changes, and transient impulses), enabling early-warning systems that can support condition-based maintenance and reduce downtime. This article presents a multi-device acoustic dataset designed to study degradation monitoring under realistic cross-device and multi-session variability. The dataset contains labeled recordings from three common motor-driven tools: a shop-vac with (i) discrete fill-level gradations (0%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 100%) and (ii) a mechanically-induced faulty state; a vacuum with (i) discrete clogging gradations (0%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 100% air-filter occlusion) and (ii) power-dial settings (0-8); and an orbital sander with wear-state gradations corresponding to sandpaper lifecycle (New, Moderate, and Worn/Faulty). Recordings were captured with multiple commodity microphones spanning smartphones and external microphones, and were intentionally split into training/testing device groups for cross-device evaluation. Each training condition was captured at two different times and locations, with microphone placement varied during capture to reduce overfitting to environment and geometry. The dataset supports research in robust acoustic condition monitoring, cross-device generalization, domain shift, and data-efficient learning for early fault detection and prognostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.