ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026
Injectate spread following posterior hip pericapsular block: a preliminary single-case anatomical observation in a formalin-fixed cadaver.
Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block may not reliably address posterior capsular innervation, potentially contributing to residual pain after hip surgery. The posterior hip pericapsular block (PHPB) was developed as a posterior periarticular injection to complement anterior approaches, but its anatomical spread has not been well characterized. Methods: In a formalin-fixed cadaver, ultrasound-guided PHPB was performed with injectate deposited in the fascial plane between the piriformis muscle and the ischiofemoral ligament adjacent to the posterior hip capsule. A total of 15 mL injectate, consisting of 13 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine mixed with 2 mL of 1% methylene blue, was administered. Layer-by-layer anatomical dissection was subsequently performed to assess injectate distribution along the posterior hip capsule and surrounding neural structures, including the sciatic nerve. Results: Dissection demonstrated dye distribution along the posterior hip capsule and the ischiofemoral ligament, with staining of small neural structures grossly consistent with previously described posterior articular branches. No macroscopic dye spread was observed on the superficial surface of the piriformis muscle or along the exposed sciatic nerve trunk. Conclusion: This preliminary single-case cadaveric observation demonstrated posterior pericapsular dye distribution after ultrasound-guided PHPB. The findings are descriptive and specimen-specific, and do not establish anatomical reproducibility, clinical efficacy, safety, or sciatic nerve sparing. Further validation in fresh-frozen cadavers with standardized injection protocols is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.