ReviewFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026
Leveraging artificial intelligence to optimize neuromodulation in the treatment of patients with chronic pain.
Review in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Urban environmental exposure as a factor in adaptive neuromodulation: a conceptual framework.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic pain that persists despite conventional therapy remains a major clinical and economic burden. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) offers an alternative for treatment of refractory pain, yet about 30% of patients experience limited or no benefit due to the subjective nature of current patient selection processes. In this mini review, we explore how artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can optimize patient selection for and improve outcomes of SCS. Existing approaches to patient selection rely on patient-reported outcomes and physician judgment, which fail to capture multifactorial influences like clinical, psychological, and socioeconomic factors that determine success of pain treatment. AI and ML methods, including supervised learning, feature selection, and risk stratification, can analyze complex datasets from electronic health records to identify predictive variables associated with sustained pain relief. Integrating these technologies into the patient selection process may enhance precision in patient screening, reduce SCS device failure and explantation rates, and lower healthcare costs. Furthermore, adaptive learning algorithms can refine predictive models in real time, improving accuracy as new data emerge. With transition from subjective assessment to data-driven decision-making, AI-guided strategies have the potential to make SCS a more reliable, equitable, and cost-effective therapy for chronic pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.