ArticleMaterials today. Bio2026
Early-apoptotic membrane engineering of M2 macrophage-derived nanovesicles enables osteoimmunomodulatory bone repair.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How Emerging Nanomaterials are Effective in Bone Regeneration?International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Critical-sized bone defects remain difficult to repair because persistent inflammation, insufficient osteogenesis, and excessive osteoclast activity collectively compromise regenerative progression. Herein, an apoptotic reparative nanovesicle platform is developed by combining M2 macrophage polarization with early apoptotic membrane remodeling. Membrane-derived nanovesicles prepared from these donor cells (M2-Apo-NVs) retain the pro-repair imprint of M2 macrophages while displaying enhanced surface phosphatidylserine exposure. Relative to M2-derived nanovesicles, M2-Apo-NVs exhibit stronger cellular internalization, more effectively reprogram inflammatory macrophages toward a pro-resolution phenotype, promote osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, and suppress RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis through inhibition of the NF-κB/NFAT axis. For local delivery, M2-Apo-NVs are incorporated into a photocrosslinkable methacrylated hyaluronic acid hydrogel, enabling sustained presentation within a murine critical-sized calvarial defect. In vivo, the composite hydrogel markedly improves bone regeneration, accompanied by reduced inflammatory signaling, enhanced osteogenic activity, and restrained osteoclast-associated remodeling. These findings establish donor-membrane state engineering as an effective strategy for upgrading cell-derived nanovesicles and identify M2-Apo-NVs as a promising osteoimmunomodulatory therapeutic for bone defect repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.