ArticleFrontiers in epidemiology2026
Challenges and pitfalls in analyzing, reporting, and interpreting health effects related to occupational and environmental exposures.
Article in Frontiers in epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Occupational and environmental epidemiology play a vital role in efforts to reduce preventable forms of disease and premature mortality worldwide by evaluating disease risk in relation to exposure sources, routes, and levels in a variety of industrial and community settings. There are considerable challenges in measuring these exposures due to wide variations in intensity, frequency, and duration. Because exposure levels and conditions often vary by site, comparing results across studies is also difficult. In this paper, we address these challenges and provide suggestions pertaining to the design, analysis, and reporting of individual studies as well as systemic reviews and meta-analyses. Key recommendations include reporting specific exposure levels within a study population and including quantitative bias assessment to address the impact of exposure measurement error on results within and across studies. These recommendations can improve the reporting quality and utility of occupational and environmental epidemiology, thereby strengthening its role in risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.