Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42293311›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2026

Underrecognized triploidy and genome-wide uniparental disomy in human blastocysts revealed by a concurrent preimplantation genetic testing approach.

Ying Li, Matthew Hoi Kin Chau, Ying Xin Zhang, Bao Heng Gui, Wai Ting Lui, Ching Man Vivian Lam, Ye Cao, Teresa Cheuk Yan Chung, Chong Cong Wu, Patricia Nga Ping Ip and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ying LiCenter for Reproductive Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6421-4858
Matthew Hoi Kin ChauDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0945-1938
Ying Xin ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3684-0450
Bao Heng GuiShenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2917-2108
Wai Ting LuiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ching Man Vivian LamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9885-2667
Ye CaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5712-1968
Teresa Cheuk Yan ChungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7515-5502
Chong Cong WuCenter for Reproductive Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.
Patricia Nga Ping IpDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
David Yiu Leung ChanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4736-8262
Yvonne Ka Yin KwokDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jacqueline Pui Wah ChungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9742-578X
Kwong Wai ChoyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3616-6200

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionWhat is the incidence of triploidy and genome-wide uniparental disomy (gwUPD) in human embryos currently undetected by conventional preimplantation genetic testing (PGT)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Triploidy and gwUPD were detected in 0.8% (8/1049) and 1.4% (15/1049) of blastocysts, respectively. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Concurrent PGT enhances embryo selection by simultaneously detecting monogenic disorders (PGT-M) or structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) and aneuploidy (PGT-A). However, triploidy and gwUPD, two genome-wide abnormalities causative of severe pregnancy outcomes, are not routinely detected by conventional PGT platforms and thus remain under-recognized at the preimplantation stage. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This study consisted of three phases: Phase I validated the detection capability of PGT-Plus on cell lines with previously ascertained genetic abnormalities; Phase II performed retrospective clinical validation on leftover trophectoderm biopsy whole-genome amplification (WGA) samples, including 65 for PGT-M, 67 for PGT-SR, and 130 for PGT-A received during January 2019 and July 2023; and Phase III was prospective implementation of PGT-Plus under a diagnostic setting on 529 blastocysts received from August 2023 to June 2024. Additionally, a cohort consisting of 258 embryo transfers, previously ascertained as euploid by conventional PGT-A methods but associated with unfavorable outcomes, was retested by PGT-Plus, which identified previously undetected cases of gwUPD or triploidy. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsIn Phase I, cell lines with ascertained genetic abnormalities were tested using at least one of the following methods, including G-banded Karyotyping, quantitative fluorescence PCR (QF-PCR), chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), and mate-pair sequencing. The previous results were compared with those from PGT-Plus. In Phase II, results from conventional PGT platforms were compared in parallel with PGT-Plus to evaluate its accuracy. Cell lines or real trophoblast biopsy samples from blastocysts were amplified by the multiple displacement amplification (MDA) method. PGT-Plus data analysis was performed in various dimensions. For PGT-A analysis, except for canonical read-count analysis to assess the genome dosage, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis was also performed to identify triploidy and gwUPD. Furthermore, for families requesting PGT-M and PGT-SR, linkage analysis was carried out for haplotype construction in addition to read-count analysis and SNP analysis. In addition to prospective cohort of Phase III, a unique cohort with adverse reproductive outcomes after transfer of a 'euploid' embryo, as determined by conventional PGT-A platforms, was retested to identify any triploidy and UPD among these copy-number neutral embryos. The unfavorable outcomes included no pregnancy, biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, and termination of pregnancy due to fetal anomaly. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: PGT-Plus detected all abnormalities ascertained by prior platforms in Phases I and II. In total, triploidy and gwUPD were detected in 0.8% (8/1049) and 1.4% (15/1049) of blastocysts, respectively. Notably, 3.5% (9/258) of the unfavorable transfers of embryos previously classified as 'euploid' would have been prevented if triploidy and gwUPD were detected. In addition, 45.7% (12/35) of embryos previously classified as balanced by PGT-SR were translocation carriers. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: PGT-Plus, similar to other relative phasing methods, requires an additional family member for haplotype determination, although an embryo with a known genotype via prior independent testing is also acceptable. In addition, short-read next-generation sequencing (NGS) impedes the capacity of PGT-Plus to directly detect pathogenic SNVs located in highly repetitive regions of the genome, e.g. the WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThis newly established PGT-Plus approach additionally detected gwUPD and triploidy in preimplantation embryos. It explained another 3.5% of 'euploid' embryo transfer failures. Meanwhile, embryo selection was enhanced by integrating PGT-M, PGT-SR, or PGT-A with an analysis of parental origin and stage of non-disjunction within a single PGT-Plus workflow. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work was funded by the Research Grant Council Collaborative Research Fund (grant no. C4062-21GF to K.W.C.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82502033 to Y.L.), and the Research Grant Council General Research Fund (grant no. 14100822 to J.P.W.C.). All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

ARTearly miscarriagegenome-wide uniparental disomyhaplotypingmolar pregnancypreimplantation genetic testingreproductive geneticssegregation errorsingle-nucleotide polymorphismtriploidy

Identifiers

PMID42293311
PMCPMC13262742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.