ReviewEJC paediatric oncology2026
Contouring and dose extraction of the maxilla, mandible and teeth on head and neck cancer radiotherapy planning scans.
Review in EJC paediatric oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Despite their vulnerability to radiation-induced damage, the maxilla and dentition are not routinely contoured in head and neck (HN) radiotherapy (RT), preventing accurate dose assessment and establishment of dose-effect relationships. This literature review aimed to: (1) identify published dentofacial contouring approaches, (2) synthesise current methods, and (3) where feasible, compare practices in paediatric and adult RT. Materials and Methods: MEDLINE and Embase were searched for studies that contoured the maxilla, mandible, or teeth in HN RT. Reference lists were manually screened. Results: Thirty-one (2003-2025) papers met inclusion criteria. Manual contouring predominated (77.4%), with substantial heterogeneity across all structures. Only seven studies (22.6%) contoured the maxilla. Tooth contouring varied from individual segmentation to variable groupings. Eight studies (25.8%) reported dental professional involvement. Conclusion: Dentofacial contouring lacks standardisation and predominantly relies on manual techniques. This variability impedes dose assessment and cross-study comparisons. Standardised international guidelines for the contouring of the maxilla, mandible and teeth are necessary to ensure uniformity and enable comparability between studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.