ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2026
Phase II Trial of First-Line Durvalumab and Chemotherapy in Patients With Extra-Pulmonary Small Cell Carcinoma.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Prospective randomized trials are lacking in extensive-stage or metastatic extra-pulmonary small cell carcinoma (EPSCC). As a result, treatment for EPSCC is largely extrapolated from SCLC studies. Methods: This single-arm phase II trial enrolled patients with EPSCC to investigate the activity of first-line durvalumab (1500 mg every 3 wk) and 4 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy (either cisplatin or carboplatin) with etoposide, followed by maintenance durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks until disease progression. All had comprehensive genomic profiling of an archival tumor specimen, using Illumina TruSight Tumour 170, Illumina TSO500, or Foundation Medicine. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 months. Key secondary end points were objective response rate, overall survival, and prognostic biomarkers, including tumor mutational burden (ACTRN12621001225808). Results: A total of six participants were enrolled (target: Conclusions: In this small prospective study, chemotherapy-durvalumab produces responses comparable to historical chemotherapy outcome, but without clear improvement in durability. Early closure due to slow accrual highlights the challenges of conducting trials in EPSCC. These findings should be considered descriptive and hypothesis generating. This study reveals that durvalumab plus chemotherapy is safe and has some activity in rare small cell cancers outside the lung, but benefits are modest and short lived. Current treatment remains largely chemotherapy based, highlighting the urgent need for larger, collaborative research efforts to find more effective options for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.