ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2026
Data-driven age partitioning for pediatric serum copper: implications for reference interval interpretation.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To establish age-specific reference intervals for serum copper in healthy Vietnamese children and adolescents using a data-driven age-partitioning approach and to assess its implications for result interpretation. Methods: Apparently healthy participants from birth to <19 years were recruited. Serum copper was measured by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Candidate age thresholds were explored using recursive partitioning analysis and subsequently rounded to clinically interpretable groups. Final age partitions were determined based on recursive partitioning results, between-group statistical comparisons, effect size, clinical interpretability, and sample size. Differences between adjacent age groups and between sexes were assessed using the Mann-Whitney Results: Of 1157 eligible participants, 36 outliers were excluded, leaving 1121 for analysis. Final age groups were 0-<6 days, 6 days to <12 months, 12 months to <7 years, and 7 to <19 years. Significant differences were observed between adjacent age groups, supporting age partitioning. Sex-related differences were small and did not support sex-specific partitions. The derived reference intervals were 1.9-15.4 μmol/L, 6.5-26.9 μmol/L, 9.3-35.8 μmol/L, and 7.9-22.6 μmol/L for the respective age groups. Conclusions: Serum copper concentrations vary substantially with age, particularly in early life, while sex differences are limited. Age-specific, but not sex-specific, reference intervals are recommended. These findings support clinically appropriate age partitioning to improve interpretation of pediatric copper results and reduce potential misclassification associated with overly broad age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.