ArticleEvolution, medicine, and public health2026
An evolutionary medicine perspective on the design of non-hormonal contraceptives for women.
Article in Evolution, medicine, and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evolutionary mismatches between the reproductive life histories of women in industrialized societies and their Paleolithic ancestors are established risk factors for gynecological pathologies and breast cancer. In contemporary women, these include earlier menarche, delayed first full-term pregnancy, and reduced or absent lactation. Hormonal contraceptives lower the risks of ovarian and endometrial cancers by suppressing ovulation and modulating menstruation, and next-generation female contraceptives, including non-hormonal approaches, should aim to retain these non-contraceptive benefits. With careful design, non-hormonal contraceptives could further improve outcomes by reducing breast cancer risk, which may be variably elevated with oral contraceptive use. Importantly, these principles also have implications for male contraception, where preserving endocrine balance while achieving effective fertility control remains a central challenge. Evolutionary medicine provides a useful framework for developing contraceptives that optimize both reproductive and long-term health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.