Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42293200›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Gastrointestinal dysfunction score for mortality prediction in intensive care unit patients with pre-existing digestive system disease: a prospective observational study.

Yiming Shi, Shangling Zhu, Zhenghua Chen, Kang Chao, Zicheng Huang, Xiang Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yiming Shi *Department of Intensive Care Unit, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shangling Zhu *Department of Rheumatology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenghua Chen *Department of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Kang ChaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zicheng HuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiang GaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction has been increasingly recognized as a common and clinically important problem in patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). GI dysfunction may affect nutrition, immune function, and microbiome homeostasis, which has been associated with adverse outcomes in ICU patients. However, conventional organ failure scores such as the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score do not adequately account for GI dysfunction, particularly in patients with pre-existing digestive system disease. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the Gastrointestinal Dysfunction Score (GIDS) in adult ICU patients with pre-existing digestive system disease and to examine whether integrating GIDS with SOFA improves discrimination for 28-day mortality compared to SOFA alone. Methods: This single-center, prospective observational study included adult patients admitted to the ICU, excluding pregnancy, ICU readmission, cessation of active treatment, loss to follow-up and death within 24 h of ICU admission. Patients were stratified into GI and non-GI cohorts based on the presence of pre-existing digestive system disease at ICU admission. GIDS, SOFA and acute gastrointestinal irnjury (AGI) gades were recorded daily for the first ICU week. We compared baseline clinical characteristics and 28-day mortality between cohorts and evaluated whether adding GIDS to SOFA improved discrimination. Results: A total of 486 patients were included, with 359 in the GI cohort. Using the score of the first day in ICU, GIDS (AUC = 0.701) outperformed AGI (AUC = 0.614). When combined with SOFA, GIDS+SOFA had the highest AUC of 0.764, compared with SOFA alone (AUC = 0.739). In the GI cohort, GIDS+SOFA also demonstrated superior discrimination (AUC = 0.754) compared to SOFA alone (AUC = 0.723). Conclusion: GIDS provides a meaningful stratification of 28-day mortality risk, especially in patients with pre-existing digestive system disease. Adding GIDS to SOFA modestly improved discrimination for 28-day mortality and warrants external validation. These findings support further validation and potential incorporation of GIDS into clinical practice.

Indexed as

acute gastrointestinal injurycritical illnessgastrointestinal dysfunctionGIDSSOFA

Identifiers

PMID42293200
PMCPMC13253419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.