Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42293172›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026

Determinants of Orthodontist Selection Among Adolescents: The Role of Digital Information Sources.

Ayça Üstdal Güney, Beyza Deniz Türkoğlu, Funda Gulay Kadioglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ayça Üstdal GüneyDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Çukurova University, Adana, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3190-864X
Beyza Deniz TürkoğluDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Çukurova University, Adana, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-0219-8543
Funda Gulay KadiogluDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Çukurova University, Adana, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-6199-0739

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Adolescents are among the primary recipients of orthodontic treatment and are active users of digital platforms. While digital environments are increasingly associated with healthcare-related perceptions, orthodontist selection is a multifactorial process influenced by various clinical, professional, and informational factors. This study aimed to evaluate adolescents' orthodontist selection criteria and to examine the role of digital information sources within this decision-making process. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 180 adolescent patients (aged 11-18 years) who attended an initial orthodontic consultation at a dentistry faculty. Data were collected using a self-administered 63-item questionnaire assessing sociodemographic characteristics, digital information-seeking behaviors, and orthodontist selection criteria. Of these, 45 items constituted the multidimensional Digital Determinants of Orthodontist Selection Instrument (DDOSI), which was developed to evaluate factors influencing orthodontist selection and demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.930). Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, exploratory factor analysis, and group comparisons using appropriate parametric and nonparametric tests. Results: Participants reported an average daily use of digital platforms of 3 ± 1.01 hours. Google (41.1%) was the most frequently used information source, whereas Instagram (28.3%) was the most commonly used social media platform. A majority of adolescents reported searching online for health-related information (75.6%) and aesthetic procedures (57.2%). The most influential criterion in orthodontist selection was clinic cleanliness (22.7%), followed by the orthodontist's professional confidence/enthusiasm (9.3%) and the use of up-to-date technological equipment (7.6%). Significant differences were observed according to age, gender, socioeconomic status, and parental education level (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Adolescents' orthodontist selection is primarily driven by clinical and professional factors. Digital information sources play a complementary role by supporting information acquisition and shaping perceptions rather than acting as primary determinants in decision-making.

Indexed as

adolescentdecision-makingdigital information sourcesorthodontist selectionpatient preference

Identifiers

PMID42293172
PMCPMC13262565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.