ReviewFrontiers in microbiomes2026
The interplay between bile acid metabolism and gut microbiome in biliary tract cancers.
Review in Frontiers in microbiomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gut microbiota and bile acids (BAs) exist in a tightly regulated, bidirectional relationship that influences host metabolism, immune function, and disease. Primary BAs synthesized in the liver are chemically transformed by intestinal microbes into a diverse pool of secondary BAs, which exert antimicrobial effects and activate host signaling pathways including Farnesoid X Receptor (FXR), Takeda G protein-coupled receptor 5 (TGR5), and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 (S1PR2). These pathways regulate BA homeostasis, epithelial barrier integrity, inflammation, and carcinogenesis. Disruption of this BA-microbiome axis has been implicated in biliary tract cancers (BTCs), a group of aggressive malignancies with rising global incidence and limited therapeutic options. Secondary BAs and BA receptor signaling contribute to tumor initiation and progression through NF-κB activation, oxidative stress, and altered cell survival, whereas reduced FXR signaling and obstructed enterohepatic circulation further promote inflammatory dysregulation. Emerging evidence demonstrates that microbial dysbiosis and altered BA metabolism are associated with distinct BTC microbial profiles, enriched in taxa such as Fusobacterium, Salmonella, Prevotella, and Actinomyces, alongside depletion of commensals including Lactobacillus. These taxa influence inflammatory signaling, BA transformation, and epithelial injury, contributing to carcinogenesis. Microbiome-BA interactions also shape anti-tumor immunity and responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Specific microbial signatures-particularly enrichment of Lachnospiraceae, Erysipelotrichaceae, Bacteroidetes, and Alistipes-correlate with enhanced immune activation and improved clinical outcomes in hepatobiliary cancers. Modulation of gut microbiota through antibiotics, probiotics, or fecal microbiota transplantation can influence BA composition, immune surveillance, and therapeutic efficacy. Collectively, these data highlight the central role of the BA-microbiome axis in BTC pathogenesis and treatment response. Microbial and BA metabolite profiling represent promising avenues for biomarker development, while targeted manipulation of BA signaling and microbial ecology offers potential therapeutic strategies to improve BTC outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.