ArticlePalliative care and social practice2026
Cost impact of in-patient specialist palliative care: A retrospective economic study of administrative end-of-life hospital costs across 7 years in Switzerland.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While healthcare costs continue to grow, an aging population along with rising chronic diseases are increasing demand for high-quality end-of-life care. Objective: Our objectives include calculating hospital cost sub-categories, such as laboratory, medication, nursing, physician, and social counseling, and evaluating the economic impact of specialist palliative care (sPC) on overall hospital costs per stay and per day of severely ill and dying patients who died at a Swiss university hospital between 2016 and 2022. Design: Retrospective, observational cohort study with a control group. Methods: We used administrative cost data from the final hospitalization of patients who died at a university hospital in Switzerland. We compared hospital costs of patients receiving care, including sPC, with those of individuals receiving usual care (UC). We defined timely sPC referral as initiating within 3 days of admission. We used a generalized linear model-assuming gamma-distributed errors and with a logarithmic link function-adjusted by inverse probability weighting to adjust for patient characteristics differences. Results: Adjusted overall hospital costs per stay were higher for sPC (Swiss francs (CHF) 31,350 (95% confidence interval (CI) 28,590-34,854)) compared with UC patients (CHF 20,351 (95% CI 18,454-22,596)); mean ratio of 1.54 ((95% CI 1.34-1.77), Conclusion: To capture intended and unintended effects and avoid oversimplified cost debates, hospital cost analyses of sPC should examine detailed cost sub-categories rather than only total costs. Cost optimization could be reached by timely transfer of patients with sPC needs. Future studies should investigate barriers to transitioning patients across care settings to improve both quality and cost-effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.