ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026
Distance-adaptive geometric margins for residual rotational uncertainty in single-isocenter multitarget stereotactic radiosurgery.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Single isocenter multitarget stereotactic radiosurgery improves efficiency for multiple brain metastases, but residual rotational uncertainty increases with target-to-isocenter distance, raising the risk of geometric miss and coverage loss. We derived an analytic model for rotational error propagation and a distance-adaptive geometric margin strategy for risk stratification and quality assurance. Materials and methods: Target displacement from residual rotations was derived using rigid body kinematics and validated with a Monte Carlo cohort of one million randomly generated targets uniformly distributed within a 200 mm radius sphere. Rotations were modeled as independent zero-mean Gaussian errors with standard deviations of 0.2°, 0.5°, and 1.0°. Analytic target registration error was compared with the exact rigid body matrix method. Dose-coverage performance was evaluated using V Results: The analytic model closely matched the matrix method, with a maximum residual below 0.2 mm. Risk increased sharply with distance. At 0.5° uncertainty, a failure transition occurred near 100 mm, where mean V Conclusions: Distance-dependent amplification of residual rotations causes distal target instability that may be obscured by mean coverage metrics. Distance-adaptive geometric margins combined with improved rotational accuracy can reduce distal failure risk while limiting normal tissue cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.