ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026
Evaluation of tumor localization accuracy on fast ring-gantry cone-beam computed tomography using patient-specific breathing curves and a dynamic anthropomorphic thorax phantom.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Fast cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) on ring-gantry systems allows for improved image quality and fast 6-second acquisition. However, 6-second acquisition might pose challenges regarding target delineation and capturing the full range of motion of moving lung tumors. Especially, in patients with slow (period > 6 s) or irregular breathing, capturing the entire tumor motion might not be guaranteed. Materials and methods: This study evaluated localization and volumetric accuracy of 6- and 60-second CBCT scans in an in-house dynamic anthropomorphic thorax phantom, with synchronized imaging capabilities. The phantom was scanned for a sinusoidal and four patient-derived breathing patterns, including regular, slow or irregular breathing. Target position and volume for 6- and 60-second acquisitions were compared to ground truth delineation on time-averaged 4D computed tomography (4DCT) reconstruction, assessing if 6-second acquisition is sufficient to accurately capture the tumor motion. Results: For sinusoidal and regular patient-derived motion, both 6- and 60-second CBCT acquisition captured target motion, compared to 4DCT (Dice Similarity Coefficient, DSC > 0.9). For large amplitudes, only one out of three 6-second scans fully captured target motion (DSC > 0.85). For slow and irregular patient-derived patterns, localization errors and volume differences up to 10.3 mm and 119% were observed using 6-second acquisition, compared to 4DCT, with superior localization and volumetric accuracy of the 60-second acquisition. Conclusion: The 6-second protocol showed accurate results, capturing full target motion for regular breathing patterns. Adaptive protocols, taking into account patient-specific breathing periods and irregularities may be preferred in patients exhibiting slow or irregular breathing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.