SynthesisFrontiers in neurology
Can robot-assisted gait training improve walking and activity abilities in persons with spinal cord injury? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) can lead to substantial impairments in walking and mobility, and traditional rehabilitation methods face limitations such as high labor intensity and insufficient training intensity and precision. While robot-assisted gait training is widely used, its therapeutic advantages over conventional rehabilitation remain controversial. Objective: Through systematic reviews and meta-analysis, this study quantitatively synthesizes existing randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence to determine the efficacy of robot-assisted gait training on walking and mobility abilities in persons with SCI. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases from their inception to June 19, 2025. We included RCTs comparing robot-assisted gait training with conventional rehabilitation. Two researchers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 8 RCTs involving 241 participants were included. Meta-analysis results showed: (1) Regarding walking ability, the robot-assisted gait training group demonstrated significant improvements in the 6-min walk test distance (SMD = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.12-1.03, Conclusion: Robot-assisted gait training effectively improves functional walking endurance, gait independence, and overall function in persons with SCI. Its core mechanism lies in promoting task-specific motor learning and neuromuscular control, rather than enhancing muscle strength. It is recommended that this technology be adopted as a primary functional improvement strategy in clinical practice, combined with targeted strength training to optimize rehabilitation outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.