ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2026
Unraveling seizure interruptions: Excitability dynamics in spike-wave activity.
Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuronal activity during a spike-wave complex (SWC) consists of highly synchronized firing of neuronal populations followed by a period of neuronal silence. It may manifest as an interictal spike or repetitive. Cortical excitability during the ascending and descending slope of the spike and during the three wave components of Spike-Wave discharges is examined in a well-established genetic rodent model of absence epilepsy using single-pulse electrical stimulation. The probability of interrupting ongoing SWDs and the electrical evoked response were assessed. Single-pulse stimulation could interrupt SWDs, primarily in the first second of an SWD, but also later, irrespective of whether stimulation occurred during the spike or wave. The amplitude of the P1 recorded from the somatosensory cortex was significantly higher during the descending phase of the spike than during the spike's ascending phase and the wave components. During the wave component, P1 amplitudes increased toward the end. The P1 made during non-REM sleep resembled those of the wave. The differences between the first second and later might be due to differences in coupling between cortex and thalamus and to the dynamics of the intraspike frequency, the differences between the two phases of the spike to the readiness and possibility to fire, while the inhibition during the wave is due to hyperpolarization. Further, the possibility of interrupting an SWD by a single pulse is not related to the changes in cortical excitability, but seems caused by an interruption of the oscillatory cortico-thalamo-cortical network driving SWDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.