Two new species of

Weiqian Meng, Surapong Khuna, Tanapol Thitla, Ning Xie, Sinang Hongsanan

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in MycoKeys, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Weiqian MengShenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University Shenzhen China https://ror.org/01vy4gh70.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3840-0992

Surapong KhunaShenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University Shenzhen China https://ror.org/01vy4gh70.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1999-4001

Tanapol ThitlaShenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University Shenzhen China https://ror.org/01vy4gh70.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3092-0679

Ning XieShenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University Shenzhen China https://ror.org/01vy4gh70.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5866-8535

Sinang HongsananShenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University Shenzhen China https://ror.org/01vy4gh70.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0550-3152

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During a survey of fungal diversity in Guangdong Province, China, two fungal strains were obtained from air contaminants, and three fungal strains were recovered from rock surfaces. Morphological characterization combined with multi-locus phylogenetic analyses based on LSU, ITS, and SSU sequence data indicated that these strains belong to the genera

Indexed as

Air-contaminated fungimulti-locus phylogenynovel speciesrock-inhabiting fungiSordariomycetessouthern China

Identifiers

PMID42293051

DOI10.3897/mycokeys.133.194192

PMCPMC13263727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.