ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Urban-rural differences in transpiration patterns of
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tree transpiration plays a critical role in water cycling and energy balance, contributing to the regulation of urban microclimates. Rapid urbanization has created pronounced urban-rural environmental differences that can substantially alter tree transpiration and its regulatory mechanisms, yet these effects remain poorly understood. Methods: We investigated the transpiration patterns of Results: The results showed that transpiration rates were significantly higher at the urban site, with mean daily rates approximately threefold greater than those at the rural site, and peak transpiration occurring 1.3 h earlier. The responses of transpiration to environmental drivers differed between sites. For example, transpiration increased with vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and plateaued at approximately 1.76 kPa at the urban site, whereas it increased initially but declined beyond a threshold of 1.33 kPa at the rural site. Transpiration at the urban site was primarily driven by photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), indicating energy-limited conditions, whereas at the rural site it was mainly constrained by soil moisture, reflecting water-limited conditions. These differences were associated with contrasting stomatal regulation strategies, with rural trees exhibiting higher sensitivity to VPD (m/g Discussion: Our results demonstrate that long-term urban-rural environmental differences reshape transpiration patterns, environmental responses, and stomatal regulation strategies in trees. These findings provide new insights into tree water-use strategies under urbanization and suggest that atmospheric drought and soil water availability jointly regulate transpiration responses across contrasting habitats. Our study also provides key parameters for improving ecohydrological models and urban forest management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.