Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42292994›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Physiological responses and evaluation of cold tolerance in red prickly ash (

Yuping Wang, Yanzhi Tan, Guowei Chen, Yahan Zhang, Junlan Liu, Meng Lin, Fang Yu, Qingbo Li, Xiaofeng Pu, Hongbing Li and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yuping WangChongqing Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation for Special Aromatic Spice Plants, College of Smart Agriculture/Institute of Special Plants, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, China.
Yanzhi TanChongqing Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation for Special Aromatic Spice Plants, College of Smart Agriculture/Institute of Special Plants, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, China.
Guowei ChenChongqing Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation for Special Aromatic Spice Plants, College of Smart Agriculture/Institute of Special Plants, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, China.
Yahan ZhangChongqing Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation for Special Aromatic Spice Plants, College of Smart Agriculture/Institute of Special Plants, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, China.
Junlan LiuChongqing Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation for Special Aromatic Spice Plants, College of Smart Agriculture/Institute of Special Plants, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, China.
Meng LinChongqing Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation for Special Aromatic Spice Plants, College of Smart Agriculture/Institute of Special Plants, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, China.
Fang YuChongqing Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation for Special Aromatic Spice Plants, College of Smart Agriculture/Institute of Special Plants, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, China.
Qingbo LiChongqing Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation for Special Aromatic Spice Plants, College of Smart Agriculture/Institute of Special Plants, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, China.
Xiaofeng PuChongqing Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation for Special Aromatic Spice Plants, College of Smart Agriculture/Institute of Special Plants, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, China.
Hongbing LiChongqing Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation for Special Aromatic Spice Plants, College of Smart Agriculture/Institute of Special Plants, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, China.
Qiang LiChongqing Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation for Special Aromatic Spice Plants, College of Smart Agriculture/Institute of Special Plants, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated how red prickly ash germplasms respond physiologically to low-temperature treatments. Sixteen red prickly ash germplasms were utilized to examine variations in physiological indices at 0, -10, -20, and -30 °C. The results showed that low-temperature treatment led to an increase in the relative conductivity (REC) of the germplasms. The semi-lethal temperatures of germplasms WCDHP, CCSJ, and HGHJ were lower than -10 °C, while those of germplasms JYH, NLJ, and CJ were higher than -7 °C. With decreasing temperature, the levels of soluble sugar (SS) and soluble protein (SP) initially declined, subsequently increased, and finally decreased, while the concentration of free proline (PRO) initially increased and then decreased. In addition, with decreasing temperature, the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) increased and then decreased, whereas those of peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) increased, then decreased, and then increased. HGHJ, CCSJ, and SZT had the highest comprehensive membership function scores, whereas CJ, JQWC, and NLJ had the lowest comprehensive scores. Eight germplasm lines (including CCSJ, PTJ, and HGHJ) screened using principal component analysis (PCA) showed strong cold tolerance, whereas BYH, TSWC, and CJ exhibited weak cold tolerance. In summary, CCSJ and HGHJ demonstrated strong cold tolerance, whereas NLJ and CJ demonstrated weak cold tolerance.

Indexed as

antioxidant enzymescold tolerance evaluationconductivitylow-temperature treatmentred prickly ash

Identifiers

PMID42292994
PMCPMC13253291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.