ArticleSAGE open nursing
Assessment of the Validity and Reliability of the Arabic Version of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) Among Undergraduate Nursing Students and Interns in Saudi Arabia.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Ten-Item Personality Inventory is widely recognised for measuring Personality traits. It has neither been translated nor psychometrically tested in an Arabic context. Aim: To assess the validity and reliability of the translated Arabic version of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) among undergraduate nursing students and interns in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional survey with translation, back-translation and panel expert validation was used. A convenient sample of 283 undergraduate nursing students and interns was selected from three higher educational institutions in Saudi Arabia. The sample was randomly split, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were then conducted on each sample. Internal consistency was determined by Cronbach's alpha coefficient, item-total corrected correlation, and mean inter-item correlation. To assess the model fitness, the following indices thresholds were used: χ3/df ≤ 3, TLI >0.90, CFI >0.90, IFI > 0.90, NFI > 0.85, RMSEA < 0.08 and SRMR < 0.80. Composite reliability, convergent, and discriminant validity were assessed for the final model. Results: The translated tool demonstrated excellent content validity. Exploratory factor analysis produced a seven-item, two-factor model accounting for 36% of the total variance. Both the McDonald's Omega and Cronbach alpha coefficients for the overall scale were 0.71 and 0.64, respectively, and the mean inter-item correlation was 0.20, suggesting acceptable internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a Seven-item, Two-factor model with mixed goodness of fit: χ3/df: 2.6, TLI: 0.85, CFI: 0.91, IFI: 0.91, NFI: 0.86, RMSEA:0.29, SRMR: 0.08, demonstrating both discriminant validity and acceptable composite reliability. However, the convergent validity was partially met. Conclusion: The final Seven-item scale contributes toward establishing an Arabic version of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. Due to the psychometric limitations, a revised version of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory might be needed to ascertain the Arabic version that best captures the underlying constructs of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.