ArticleInternational journal of public health2026
Development and external validation of an interpretable machine learning model for obesity-depression comorbidity in Korean and US adults.
Article in International journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the association between physical inactivity and obesity-depression comorbidity (ODC), defined as the co-occurrence of obesity and depression, and to develop an effective screening tool for identifying high-risk individuals to facilitate early intervention. Methods: Data were obtained from 3,357 physically inactive adults enrolled in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES, 2007-2012). An XGBoost machine learning framework was applied to develop predictive models. Feature selection was conducted using random forest, and the prediction mechanism was interpreted with SHAP values. The model was validated internally using KNHANES 2011-2012 data and externally with the U.S. NHANES dataset. Results: The XGBoost model demonstrated good discriminative performance in internal validation (AUC = 0.783 and 0.744) and achieved an external validation AUC of 0.886. Feature importance analysis revealed that insulin concentration, white blood cell count, and height were the primary predictors of ODC, with insulin exerting the strongest influence. Conclusion: This study developed a high-performing and interpretable prediction model for ODC risk. SHAP-based interpretation identified insulin as the most influential predictor within the model, suggesting that metabolic factors may be important for ODC risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.