ReviewPCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2026
Digital harassment and its mental health impact among healthcare professionals: A scoping review.
Review in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anticipated online harassment and potential chilling effects on mandatory child abuse reporting: A pilot survey of pediatricians in Japan.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital harassment, including workplace cyberbullying, online defamation, and social media attacks, has been reported among healthcare professionals. This scoping review systematically maps existing evidence on digital harassment and its mental health consequences among healthcare professionals. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Ichushi-Web through December 2025. Twenty-four studies from 12 countries were included. Workplace cyberbullying prevalence ranged from 1.5% to 46.6%. Across studies, digital harassment was reported in association with depression, anxiety, burnout, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and moral injury-related experiences, although causal relationships could not be established. Seven included studies (28%) addressed pandemic-related digital harassment, including online abuse and stigmatization of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 period. Within the English- and Japanese-language literature identified in this review, Japanese studies were limited (three studies). From a consultation-liaison psychiatry perspective, harassment following ethically mandated actions may relate to moral injury-related experiences and may warrant further attention to institutional support. Evidence for effective interventions remains scarce. This review suggests that digital harassment may represent an emerging occupational concern with potential mental health implications. The evidence base was predominantly cross-sectional and methodologically heterogeneous, and findings should therefore be interpreted cautiously. Important needs include institutional policies, legal protections, psychological support systems, and further research on intervention effectiveness and cross-cultural patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.